BLOG: No Limits on Term Limits

If the people want to vote on term limits, no one, politician or fellow voter, should stand in the way of the democratic process.

Central to the discussion of is the fundamental truth stated by the noted British historian Lord Acton, when he said, "Power tends to corrupt; absolute power corrupts absolutely.” That truism is placed in proper context when it is noted that 98.5% of incumbents who rerun for office are reelected to the non term-limited U.S. Congress. (www.termlimits.org

How many political incumbents can we name that we know should be replaced, but history proves that name recognition, voter apathy and the high cost of running a campaign puts the advantage of winning an election squarely on the incumbents? Imagine if there were no term limits on the U.S. Presidency and George W. Bush had continued to be reelected indefinitely!

Municipal term limits have spread quietly but steadily across country. There are nearly 3,000 term-limited cities, counties and municipalities in the United States, including 10 of our largest cities, such as Los Angeles, New York, Houston, and even Peoria.

Support for term limits goes back to Thomas Jefferson who in 1789 proposed a limited political tenure "to prevent any danger which might arise to the freedoms of the people" by having members of the Continental Congress remain in office too long. Our nation's framers must be writhing in their graves at the political system that rules us today, instead of vice versa, with its dominant cadre of lifelong career politicians and its embedded culture of corruption.

Entrenched and self-serving politicians argue that the election process alone should dictate the number of terms they are allowed to serve. Okay. Then why do they stand in the way of having the proposition placed on the ballot and letting the people vote on it? 

This applies as well to the voters who are against term limits. Okay. So support putting the proposition on the ballot and let the people vote on it. Those who seek to prevent this or any other public issue from going before the voters are traitors to democracy. Voters should cast a suspicious eye upon the incumbent politician who seeks to prevent them from voting on the issue of term limits, or any other one for that matter.

I think they should stay out of it and honor the democratic process. It is not about them, it is about the people and the good of the city. If it is so that politicians are only reelected because they are who the people want, then why has the approval of congressional members ranged from 13-17% in recent months?

I realize that some members of this City Council have tried to move on but have found that they are unelectable to higher office, so they simply stay. Others have no desire to move on and give up their local realm of power. It may be true that some of them have done "good things" and they should. They are elected and expected to do "good things."

It depends on the balance. And that does not mean that someone else could not do better or that we should not hear new ideas from new people; in fact the opposite is true. We should welcome new brain power as well as new faces and voices that might be very talented and capable, but feel marginalized by a process that renders them helpless to compete.

Replacing council members also means periodically replacing some city employees and that would also help to eliminate a lot of the corruptive, stale and stagnant politics that occur when the same people retain positions of control and power for too long. If term limits are a threat to politicians, so be it. They are good for the people.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

Manny September 07, 2012 at 11:59 PM
What your saying are many reasonable points that some residents might agree with and can lead to change. It just seems like all I'm hearing lately is putting all our eggs into the one basket of term limits. Quality, qualified and smart candidates should start considering the 2013 election. As a bonus, if people choose to sign a petition for 13 years from now....go for it.
Riley September 08, 2012 at 12:24 AM
Money and the Supreme Court put George W. in office two times and I have no doubt it could easily have put him in a third term. However, that correlation is ludacrous.
Riley September 08, 2012 at 12:54 AM
Manny, we ARE going for it! And the qualified candidates can't get their nomination papers until mid October...but they will! The reason term limits could not be applied retroactively is that that is illegal, so you take what you can get. Forward!
GoodGriefCharlieBrown September 08, 2012 at 04:41 AM
There is a very clear and concise concept to the issue at hand. Let the people vote. This is not even an issue if whether or not one supports term limits, but rather an issue of supporting the people's right to decide. If term limits does not become a ballot measure, no one will ever know what the outcome of the people's vote would have been. That is a sad statement on a city that says it is progressive, creative & diverse. You cannot say you respect the majority opinion if you would choose to supress their voice. It IS that simple. The rest is superfluous & pointless chatter. Let the people vote.
GoodGriefCharlieBrown September 08, 2012 at 04:53 AM
Ironic that D'Amico is the only one who has stated he would only serve for 2 terms and is also the only one who many people hope will break his promise. I think D'Amico is sincere in his quest for change in West Hollywood and has his feet planted firmly on solid ground. He has more common sense, maturity - emotional & otherwise- and grasp on reality than the other 4 members all put together. If I had to pick a lifer, it would be D'Amico.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »