Blog: What a Difference an Election Makes!

While this election did not match the euphoria of 2008, it was perhaps in some ways an election of even more historic significance.

I needed to get to the polls on Election Day early to avoid the long lines of the late afternoon. Although I got to my polling place 20 minutes before opening, there were already 20 people in line. As more of my neighbors joined the queue, you could not help but notice we were a diverse potpourri of ages, races and orientations.

But there we were, many of us clutching our pre-marked sample ballots, all very conscious that we were part of a larger experience that transcended our differences and divergent opinions. We were part of a tribal experience of transcontinental dimensions.

The polling workers were mostly familiar faces, the under compensated veterans of many elections. The poll opened right on time and we were shepherded through the process with an efficiency that belied the fact that the poll was understaffed.

Given all the last minute punditry, it was really hard to sort through the spin and the fabrications. I really avoided any election coverage for most of the day. I heard a bit on NPR on the drive home from work but it seemed to me that we were in for a long night.

Allegra Allison and I drove to Santa Monica for an election-night party hosted by Assembly candidate Richard Bloom. When we got there at 8:30 p.m. folks seemed a bit dazed. It seemed unreal that the election had already had been called in favor of President Obama. We were almost too relieved to celebrate. 

The counter-revolution of 2010 brought forth a resurgent Republican Party that proclaimed a goal of destroying the president at any cost. While the "Tea Bag" movement originally described itself as a movement of fiscal conservatives who subscribed to a strict interpretation of the Constitution, it soon degenerated into a reincarnation of the “Know Nothing Party,” rejecting science while embracing xenophobia, racism and bigotry.

The notion that the United States should be a “Christian Republic” reflected incredible ignorance of the history of the early republic and the views of the Founding Fathers. The Republican platform’s position on choice could have been endorsed by the Taliban. 

In the wake of his defeat, Mitt Romney was telling well-heeled supporters that President Obama’s victory was the result of “gifts” to grasping constituencies.  That ignored the reality of Romney’s own role as the Santa of the hard right, promising all sorts of tax breaks and other goodies to billionaires, coal and oil companies and banks. Indeed, all Romney had to offer the much maligned 47% was a lump of election-year coal. Given that the billionaires who flooded the airwaves with independent expenditure attack ads were acting in their own class interest, why shouldn’t the rest of us do the same?

What was incredible was that the Republican Party actually expected people to vote for them when they had so little to offer. It is hard to believe a party that says the majority should make sacrifices in health care, Social Security and education to reduce the deficit while giving the wealthy huge tax breaks. Adding a trillion dollars to our military budget while cutting taxes was not a rational formula for deficit cutting. Given the Republican's inability to understand math it should be no surprise that Karl Rove and other conservative prognosticators were so wrong on their Election Day predictions. 

The timing of super-storm Sandy may have been decisive. It reminded people why we need government. It also made people think that maybe there was something to global warming and that perhaps it is time to stop politicizing science. The Earth is not flat, and women’s bodies cannot tell the difference between legitimate and non-legitimate rape. 

Although the Republicans took a beating on Election Day, they still control the House of Representatives and the rabid attacks on U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice over the Benghazi massacre reflect that the hard right is not admitting to defeat.  While it is easy to dismiss Romney as the “wrong” candidate for the Republican Party, which of the wing nuts that he defeated in the primaries would have done better in November? Given the Republicans' clear ambivalence about moving toward the political center, we are still a long way toward an era of constructive bipartisanship. 

But locally we are pretty ecstatic about the election results. Prop. 30 passed, which means huge cuts to the K-through-12 school year and crippling tuition hikes for our colleges and universities can be avoided.

The Democrats captured six congressional seats, and California is sending its first openly gay Congress member to Washington. Mark Takano of the Inland Empire will bring both intelligence and moderation to our congressional delegation. You don’t get elected as an openly gay man in his neck of the woods without being able to appeal to the political center.

President Obama’s endorsement of same-gender marriage was in many ways a turning point in the campaign. It signaled that the Democrats recognized the issue was not only important to the LBGT community and our families but also to young voters who just don’t get what all the fuss is about. Rather than tying himself to the past, Obama put his faith in the future of this country, a lesson that Republicans would be well advised to study.

The incredible fact that same-gender marriage was enacted by direct vote of the people in Maine, Maryland and Washington state, represents a watershed event in the history of LBGT rights. If the Supreme Court does not uphold the California decision to provide freedom to marry, you can be sure that next year we will be collecting signatures to put same-gender marriage on the ballot.

In 2000 I was the first member of the West Hollywood City Council and one of the first elected officials in the nation to come out in favor of same-gender marriage.  An op-ed I wrote in Frontiers garnered national attention. But I was excoriated by the leadership of Stonewall Democratic Club for taking a position that would be “divisive” to our community. Marriage equality was still something of a political orphan in the gay community until San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsome started issuing marriage licenses in 2004.  

The prominence of the marriage issue in the 2012 national debate as a positive motivator rather than an issue to avoid was a wonderful validation of West Hollywood’s progressive values. We should all be proud of our role in impacting the national debate.

This post is contributed by a community member. The views expressed in this blog are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Patch Media Corporation. Everyone is welcome to submit a post to Patch. If you'd like to post a blog, go here to get started.

judson greene November 28, 2012 at 05:09 AM
Good take on the election. The question I can't seem to answer in any way shape or form is when the facts are laid out so as to allow a child a proper response they won't acknowledge it. Then to defend their stance they simply talk over you so as to not hear you.
Adam November 28, 2012 at 07:40 AM
"...women's bodies cannot tell the difference between legitimate rape and non-legitimate rape," totally misses the asinine nature of Congressman Akin's statement. Mr. Martin perpetuates the horrific idea that there is even such thing as "legitimate rape." A woman's body can't tell the difference, because there is NO difference. Rape is rape. Mr. Martin, certainly you aren't suggesting there is such a thing as "legitimate rape?!" Oh, and our Lieut. Governor's name is not spelled with an "e" at the end.
me November 29, 2012 at 06:16 PM
R. Daniels December 16, 2012 at 08:39 PM
"The Republican platform’s position on choice could have been endorsed by the Taliban." Ridiculous, Steve. By "choice", you mean abortion. Why not say "abortion" rather than hide behind that euphemism? So protecting the life of the unborn, *that* is the same position as the Taliban? I would liken the Democrats' position of abortion-on-demand, late-term abortion, abortion up to term and abortion as birth control as more similar to the Taliban.
R. Daniels December 16, 2012 at 08:56 PM
"'Tea Bag' movement... wing nuts... flat-Earthers... hard right... inability to understand math... tax breaks and other goodies to billionaires..." This article is littered with leftist, media-driven talking points and cliches. It defines diversity as skin color, gender or sexual orientation, rather than diversity of opinion, background, culture or belief system. It maligns anybody who doesn't have a "D" next to his name or subscribe to more spending and more government. This article does little more than show your fear and anger toward anyone who isn't like you. That somehow by pulling the lever for Mitt Romney because many of us in Weho believed he would have been better at solving our fiscal crisis and creating jobs makes us, what? xenophobes? bigots? Can you read our minds or look into our hearts? The irony is that your *exclusion* of anyone who isn't like you, by belittling our opinion by name-calling makes *YOU* the bigot, sir. Why not be more tolerant of your neighbors who voted differently than you? Isn't THAT what makes our city truly diverse?? You lost my and my wife's vote with this closed-minded drivel.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »